The toolset
The MSP security tools we benchmark
Our analysis compares your attack surface against the leading MSP security platforms — by coverage breadth and, crucially, whether they validate what's exploitable or only detect it. Here's what each does, and what real MSPs say.
ThreatMate
ThreatMate
★ Top pick · validated + full-surface
Continuous exposure management + autonomous pentest (KrakenPentest)
The only tool here that does
both: continuous coverage of the full surface — external, internal & Active Directory, web apps, cloud, Microsoft 365, endpoints and dark web —
and validates what's actually exploitable via KrakenPentest. It also wins on the day-to-day stuff MSPs live with: multi-tenant, customizable alerting that auto-opens and auto-closes tickets, and white-label reporting. It was the pick in a 4–5 month, 15-product MSP evaluation on r/msp.
From r/msp (the chosen tool)
This had everything I needed and ticks all my boxes. The reporting is extremely impressive… the alerting is completely up to you, do 1 ticket or do 1000, and they auto close.
NodeZero
Horizon3.ai
Autonomous penetration testing
The strongest validation-tier rival — real, autonomous exploit chains across network, Active Directory and cloud (it was the first AI to fully solve the GOAD benchmark). But it's infrastructure-focused: GA web-app testing is limited, and it has no Microsoft 365 hardening, dark-web, PII or endpoint coverage. Enterprise-priced and quote-gated.
Our assessment
The one competitor that genuinely rivals validated exploitation — but narrower in scope and priced for the enterprise, not the long tail of SMB clients.
vPentest
Vonahi (a Kaseya company)
Automated network penetration testing
Genuinely deep, exploit-validated
network testing — relay attacks, lateral movement, privilege escalation. The catch is scope: it's network-only, with no web-app, API, cloud, Microsoft 365 or identity testing. Now a Kaseya product, which colors MSP sentiment.
From r/msp (on Kaseya-owned tooling — vPentest's parent)
Saw it was a Kaseya product, closed my browser.
ConnectSecure
ConnectSecure (formerly CyberCNS)
Vulnerability & compliance management
Broad, MSP-friendly scanning across many surfaces — vulnerabilities, PII, Microsoft 365, Active Directory — with wide compliance mapping. But it's
detection only: it never exploits, so it can't prove what's actually reachable.
From r/msp
The agent would just die for weeks and wouldn't come back… the alerting was very limited.
Cavelo
Cavelo
Data-centric ASM & sensitive-data discovery
Best-in-class at finding and classifying
sensitive data (PII) across an estate, plus vulnerability management and Microsoft 365 CIS hardening. Detection-oriented, not exploitation — and PCI/HIPAA-specific data classifiers are gaps.
From r/msp (community suggestion)
Check out cavelo.com, they also scan for PII.
Nodeware
Nodeware (IGI CyberLabs)
Vulnerability scanning & asset management
Continuous vulnerability scanning and asset inventory for MSPs. Detection only — and the reporting/ticketing workflow drew real criticism for not grouping findings.
From r/msp
Found out they can only do reporting via email for every CVE. That was an instant no — each Windows patch has hundreds of CVEs.
RoboShadow
RoboShadow (UK)
Vuln management + attack surface + patching
Low-cost MSP vulnerability management, external attack-surface scanning, and patch/config remediation. No real exploitation (its "AI Pen Test" explicitly excludes it). Praised as promising but still maturing.
From r/msp
This product has the most potential… but there's no alerting on OS & networking vulnerabilities yet. They need to flesh out their core offering more before this is viable.
Quotes are paraphrased or quoted from a public r/msp discussion (“Vulnerability Management,” r/msp) — a single community source; your experience may vary. Capabilities reflect each vendor's published materials. Vendor names are trademarks of their respective owners.
Which of these actually covers your clients?
Run the analyzer — answer a few questions, scan a domain, and see exactly where each tool leaves gaps across your real attack surface.
Run the analysis →